<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Royal Enfield, time over for excuses?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yogeshsarkar.com/blog/2010/04/12/royal-enfield-time-over-for-excuses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yogeshsarkar.com/blog/2010/04/12/royal-enfield-time-over-for-excuses/</link>
	<description>An online journal of my life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reeto</title>
		<link>http://www.yogeshsarkar.com/blog/2010/04/12/royal-enfield-time-over-for-excuses/comment-page-1/#comment-20961</link>
		<dc:creator>Reeto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yogeshsarkar.com/blog/?p=1475#comment-20961</guid>
		<description>The new engine is light years better in terms of fuel efficiency. I own a TBTS and it consistently returns me an economy of 45 kmpl. Also the top end has marginally moved up with the UCE engines. The CI350 used to puff and pant and eventually max out at 100 kmph, the new UCE350 is capable of a 120 kmph provided it is given a long stretch of empty road. On my TBTS, I couldn&#039;t manage above 115 kmph but that might be on account of the stock silencer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new engine is light years better in terms of fuel efficiency. I own a TBTS and it consistently returns me an economy of 45 kmpl. Also the top end has marginally moved up with the UCE engines. The CI350 used to puff and pant and eventually max out at 100 kmph, the new UCE350 is capable of a 120 kmph provided it is given a long stretch of empty road. On my TBTS, I couldn&#8217;t manage above 115 kmph but that might be on account of the stock silencer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacqui</title>
		<link>http://www.yogeshsarkar.com/blog/2010/04/12/royal-enfield-time-over-for-excuses/comment-page-1/#comment-15491</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacqui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yogeshsarkar.com/blog/?p=1475#comment-15491</guid>
		<description>I like the old Royal they are historic bikes!
The new EFI is naturaly more reliable,powerfull and economic in
petrol and oil!!I have a lot of pleasure with the two types!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the old Royal they are historic bikes!<br />
The new EFI is naturaly more reliable,powerfull and economic in<br />
petrol and oil!!I have a lot of pleasure with the two types!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.yogeshsarkar.com/blog/2010/04/12/royal-enfield-time-over-for-excuses/comment-page-1/#comment-10946</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yogeshsarkar.com/blog/?p=1475#comment-10946</guid>
		<description>i wasn&#039;t impressed much by the classic, i still feel the standard is much better...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wasn&#8217;t impressed much by the classic, i still feel the standard is much better&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

